AI ROI tools compared: Larridin, Olakai, SilkFlo, Ascerta and Roiva
What five AI ROI tools say they measure, what they charge, and which question each answers, taken from each vendor's own site as of October 5, 2026.
Roiva wrote this, and Roiva is one of the five tools in it. Everything said here about the other four comes from that vendor's own website, read on October 5, 2026, and links to the page it came from. Prices and features change, so check the vendor's page before you rely on a row.
Which tools measure the ROI of AI?
Five tools sell themselves on measuring what AI returns to a business: Larridin, Olakai, SilkFlo, Ascerta and Roiva. They answer different questions, so the useful comparison is which question you have, not which tool scores highest.
An AI ROI tool is software that records what an AI investment cost and what it returned, so the two can be compared. The five differ most in what they count as a return.
| Tool | How it describes itself | The question it is built to answer | Published price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Larridin | An "AI Value Measurement Platform" | How much AI people and agents use across the business, what it costs, and how much work it contributes | From $25,000 a year, annual contract |
| Olakai | Adoption, time saved and shadow AI across every AI tool | Who uses which AI tools, what the licenses return, and where the company is exposed | Free for up to 4 seats; $5 per employee a month (Assistive); $25 per developer a month (Agentic); Enterprise custom |
| SilkFlo | An "AI Value Realization Platform" | Which AI and automation ideas to fund, and whether their business cases delivered | From £60 per admin a month; Pro £130; Enterprise custom |
| Ascerta | Connects every AI agent to business outcomes | Returns by AI use case and business unit, wasted spend, and how provisioned AI capacity is used | Not published |
| Roiva | Run your AI portfolio on numbers your CFO will accept | What each AI initiative cost against its approved budget, the cash it returned, the capacity it freed, and what was decided about it | A free account with no expiry; paid plans from $15,000 a year |
What does each tool count as value?
Each tool counts something different as value, and the difference matters most when a CFO reads the figure. Hours of work and dollars of cash are both called "value" in this market, and they are not the same thing.
- Larridin reports AI capacity: the human-equivalent work AI contributes, at 40 hours a week per people-equivalent. Its own site says this is not automatically time saved, cash returned or a reduction in headcount (larridin.com).
- Olakai translates adoption and time saved into the dollars your licenses return (olakai.ai).
- SilkFlo builds financial models for Copilot, RPA and agentic AI business cases, and tracks benefits realization across the portfolio (silkflo.com).
- Ascerta measures use-case returns and evaluates performance by business unit (ascerta.com).
- Roiva reports two figures and never adds them. Cash value is money that shows in the books. Freed capacity is hours freed, priced at what they cost. ROI is taken over cash value alone. A figure counts only once it is approved, by a person or by an auto-approve setting the account turns on, and each one says where it came from: a versioned formula, a synced source record, or a named person's entry (methodology).
When is another tool the better fit?
If your question isn't about the return on each AI initiative, one of the other four, or a tool from a neighboring category, is likely to serve you better. Match the tool to the question you will be asked.
| If the question is | Look at |
|---|---|
| Who in the company uses which AI tools, and is anything unapproved in use? | Usage and adoption tools, such as Olakai and Larridin |
| Which team, model or engineer drove the AI bill? | AI cost and FinOps tools, such as CloudZero, Vantage and Flexera |
| Is AI changing how fast engineering ships? | Engineering intelligence tools, such as Jellyfish, DX and LinearB |
| Which automation ideas should we fund first? | Pipeline and business-case tools, such as SilkFlo |
| Did each AI initiative return cash against its approved budget, and what did we decide about it? | Roiva |
What doesn't Roiva do?
Roiva doesn't measure AI usage or adoption across the workforce. It has no browser extension and reads none of the prompts people send to their AI tools, so it can't tell you who uses which assistant or find unapproved tools by their use.
- It doesn't split AI spend by person or team. Costs land on an initiative, month by month. A FinOps tool answers the per-person question.
- It has no SOC 2 report yet. Roiva's SOC 2 Type 2 program with Oneleet started on September 25, 2026 (security). Larridin lists SOC 2 Type II on its site.
- It makes no causal claim. Roiva runs no experiments. The methodology says what the method does not prove.
If none of the five fits, a spreadsheet or a warehouse build may. Building an AI ROI tracker yourself covers what that takes and where home-built trackers break.
How should you compare AI ROI tools?
Ask each vendor to take one figure from its own sample output and trace it back to the record it came from. How far that trace goes tells you more than a feature list.
Five questions to ask along the way:
- Where does the before-figure, the baseline, come from, and who chose it?
- Does a figure count before anyone approves it?
- Is freed time reported as cash, or beside it?
- If a formula changes, does last quarter's figure still reproduce?
- What does the tool read from your systems, and what does it keep?
Roiva's answers are in its sample reports, which trace each figure for a fictional company, and in What makes a figure auditable.
See what Roiva would hand your CFO
The sample reports show a Board Brief, a Value Evidence Register and a Portfolio Snapshot for a fictional company, with every figure traced to its source.
Get the next one
New field notes by email as they're published. Or subscribe to the RSS feed.